| So where does "change" come from?
If we were to become viscerally aware of the suffering of animals raised for food, I think we'd change our behavior. We would eat less meat, or we would advocate for more humane treatment of animals.
Change would arise from awareness and compassion. As the Buddha taught, compassion arises from compassion.
As a Buddhist, I think Prop 2 makes a lot of sense. The whole factory farm system in this country is not only morally appalling, it's producing food that's less healthy. For instance, because animals are basically forced to live in their own excrement, more fecal matter finds its way into the human food supply.
So you can make the case that better treatment of animals will result in better, safer food for us and our loved ones. As the Dalai Lama says, Buddhists are self-interested, but self-interested in the sense of knowing that we benefit from that which benefits all living beings.
(The treatment of "factory farm" animals is deeply disturbing, but check out the funny, entertaining video at Yes On Prop 2 -- brilliant.)
Contrast California's Prop 2 with the "Personhood" initiative that's on the Colorado ballot. The "Personhood" amendment would define a fertilized egg as a human being. The point of the measure is to ultimately outlaw abortion and, possibly, criminalize birth control. I don't support it.
As a Buddhist, I have to ask myself: If my aspiration is to benefit all living beings, how can I support humane treatment of farm animals, yet resist attempts to outlaw abortion? Do I think animals are more worthy of legal protection than a human embryo?
Am I cruel and exploitative for supporting a woman's right to choose?
I don't think so. I'm just thinking aloud, here -- I know the abortion issue is waaay more complicated than just saying, "abortion equals death."
I'm interested in what others have to say on the topics of animal cruelty, abortion and voting on these issues. |